| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 4612 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Gangadhar Bera vs ACIT and Ors.
Writ petition and assessment-Non-disclosure of relevant facts to court-AY 2001-02. The assessee had challenged the notice issued under s.143(2) of the Income Tax Act 1961 by way of a writ petition on the grounds that it w [LexDoc Id : 321893]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2006 |
A.I. Kurian vs CIT and Anr.
Prima facie adjustments to income returned-Expenses not allowable-AY 1995-96, 1996-97. The assessee had incomes from salary, house property, capital gains and from other sources. In the absence of hire charges fallin [LexDoc Id : 320008]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2006 |
ACIT vs Uday S. Kotak
Business expenditure-Sub-brokerage paid by share broker-AY 1992-93. The assessee, a share broker, derived his income to mainly from brokerage in secondary market. He paid sub-brokerage to certain concerns a [LexDoc Id : 319915]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Sushma Harish Sharma and Anr. vs Hotel Horizon (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 319195]
|
CLB |
2006 |
Faridabad Investment Company Ltd. vs CIT
KVSS: Validity of Circular-Circular permitting for settlement of tax arrears-AY 1991-92 – 1994-95. The Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998 was a voluntary scheme permitting the assessee to settle long-standing disputes. The assessee [LexDoc Id : 317220]
|
ITAT (Calcutta) |
2006 |
Kiran Nagji Nisar vs ITO
Disallowance of expenses-Expenses for exempt income-The interest payable on funds borrowed for purchase of shares could not be allowed as deduction since dividend income was exempt from tax.
S. [LexDoc Id : 308315]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Olympic Zippers (P) Ltd. vs CTT
[LexDoc Id : 381232]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
Urvashi Steel Industries (P) Ltd. and Anr. vs CTO and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 368666]
|
WBTT |
2006 |
Himachal Pradesh State Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd. vs Pamwi Tissues Ltd. and Anr.
State Financial Corporation-Recovery of loan-The State Financial Corporation had entered into a loan agreement with the defendants for assistance of Rs.60 lakhs. As per the agreement, the defenda [LexDoc Id : 327274]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2006 |
Gauri Shankar Prasad Singh and Ors. vs Baid Nath Prasad Singh
[LexDoc Id : 325043]
|
HC (Patna) |
2006 |
Peerless Shipping and Oil Field Services Ltd. and Anr. vs State Of Assam and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 324042]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
Anish V. Kumar vs Regional Transport Authority and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 320626]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2006 |
University of Kerala and Anr. vs Kiran Gopalakrishnan
[LexDoc Id : 320611]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2006 |
Atul Bora vs Akan Bora
[LexDoc Id : 320397]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
Jagdish Raj Chauhan vs CIT
Appeal to CIT(A)-Delay in appeal vs Revival of appeal-AY 1991-92. The CIT(A) did not entertain the appeal against assessment of AOP without adjustment of tax paid by members of AOP in their individual as [LexDoc Id : 319792]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2006 |
Vast Textiles Ltd. and etc., In re
Scheme of arrangement-Sanction of court-A scheme of arrangement was sanctioned after omission of para providing for increase in share capital since the capital of the company could be sancti [LexDoc Id : 318981]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2006 |
Janak S. Rangwalla vs ACIT
Capital gains vs Business income-Sale of shares held as investments-AY 2000-01. The assessee held a large number of shares as investment. Merely because the transactions of sale and purchase of shares in the preceding [LexDoc Id : 309521]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Santhosh Kumar vs Baby and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 349281]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2006 |
Sri Premananda Trust vs DCIT and Ors.
Auction sale of attached property-Locus standi to file writ-The properties which were put on auction by Tax Recovery Officer did not stand in the name of the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner had no locus s [LexDoc Id : 346577]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2006 |
D.C. Srivastava vs DIT
Validity of search-Absence of reasons to believe-The assessee was found carrying a cash of Rs. 10 each at the airport. He declared that it was from his income and that he was from his income and that [LexDoc Id : 324978]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2006 |
Laxman Ram vs Kishana Ram
[LexDoc Id : 320800]
|
HC (Rajasthan) |
2006 |
B and A Plantation and Industries Ltd. and Anr. vs CIT and Ors.
Validity of revision by CIT-Revision on basis of audit objection, No independent application of mind-AY 1995-96. The AO had allowed payment of bonus as per s.43B of the Income Tax Act 1961 in the original assessment, but later a notice for rectificati [LexDoc Id : 319584]
|
HC (Gauhati) |
2006 |
Diabari Tea Co. Ltd. vs Kanak Lata Saha
[LexDoc Id : 318977]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2006 |
Life Insurance Corpn. of India vs JCIT
Dividend distribution tax-Dividend vs Distribution of surplus income-AY 1998-99. The assessee, a statutory corporation, was established under the Life Insurance Corporation of India Act 1956 for carrying on the insuranc [LexDoc Id : 318561]
|
ITAT (Mumbai) |
2006 |
Jaininder Jain and Ors. vs Arihant Jain and Ors.
Suit against infringement in foreign court-'Status Quo' order in operation-An interim order that restrained the respondent from filing an infringement suit against the petitionetr before a foreign court was upheld. The Indian [LexDoc Id : 316933]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2006 |
| |
| First | Prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
